4.6 Article

A Theory of the Wind-Driven Beaufort Gyre Variability

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 3263-3278

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-16-0091.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF
  2. Howland Postdoctoral Program Fund at WHOI
  3. Stanback Fellowship Fund at Caltech
  4. NSF [PLR-1415489, OCE-1232389]
  5. NASA [NNN12AA01C]
  6. NSF OPP [PLR-1313614, PLR-1203720]
  7. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1415489] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The halocline of the Beaufort Gyre varies significantly on interannual to decadal time scales, affecting the freshwater content (FWC) of the Arctic Ocean. This study explores the role of eddies in the Ekman-driven gyre variability. Following the transformed Eulerian-mean paradigm, the authors develop a theory that links the FWC variability to the stability of the large-scale gyre, defined as the inverse of its equilibration time. The theory, verified with eddy-resolving numerical simulations, demonstrates that the gyre stability is explicitly controlled by the mesoscale eddy diffusivity. An accurate representation of the halocline dynamics requires the eddy diffusivity of 300 + 200 m(2) s(-1), which is lower than what is used in most low-resolution climate models. In particular, on interannual and longer time scales the eddy fluxes and the Ekman pumping provide equally important contributions to the FWC variability. However, only large-scale Ekman pumping patterns can significantly alter the FWC, with spatially localized perturbations being an order of magnitude less efficient. Lastly, the authors introduce a novel FWC tendency diagnostic-the Gyre Index-that can be conveniently calculated using observations located only along the gyre boundaries. Its strong predictive capabilities, assessed in the eddy-resolving model forced by stochastic winds, suggest that the Gyre Index would be of use in interpreting FWC evolution in observations as well as in numerical models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据