4.7 Article

Separation characters of an axial-flow hydrocyclone with oil collecting pipe

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122139

关键词

Oil-water separation; Flow field analysis; Droplet trajectory; Axial flow hydrocyclone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on experiment and numerical simulation, a new type of efficient oil-water separator with high separation accuracy was constructed in this study by adding oil collecting pipe. Experimental results showed that, in the treatment of 10% oil mixture, when the inlet flow rate was 0.5 m/s, the volume fraction of oil at the oil outlet could reach 45%, and the volume fraction of oil at the water outlet could be reduced to 0.0724%. The novel separator exhibits great potential in oil fields with high water content or offshore platforms according to the laboratory-scale tests.
In many offshore fields, water takes up 90 % of the produced fluid. The compact and efficient centrifugal pre -separation method is expected to replace the traditional sedimentation separator, which takes up a large area and is low in efficiency. The centrifugal separator can achieve rapid separation of produced fluids in the compact space of offshore platforms. However, conventional tangential inlet or axial hydrocyclone is poor-performed for high water content mixture due to droplet breakage caused by tangential inlet and unstable oil core in outlet section caused by axial inlet. In this paper, based on experiment and numerical simulation, a new type of efficient oil-water separator of high separation accuracy is constructed by the structural innovation of adding oil col-lecting pipe. In the treatment of 10 % oil mixture, when the inlet flow rate was 0.5 m/s, the volume fraction of oil at the oil outlet can reach 45 % and the volume fraction of oil at the water outlet can be reduced to 0.0724 %. According to the laboratory-scale tests, the novel separator shows great potential in oil field with high water content or offshore platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据