4.7 Article

Boehmite aerogel with ultrahigh adsorption capacity for Congo Red removal: Preparation and adsorption mechanism

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122065

关键词

Boehmite aerogel; Sol -gel; Freeze-drying; Congo Red; Adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872210, 51672194]
  2. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories [SKLAR202106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a boehmite aerogel with a high specific surface area was developed as an efficient adsorbent for Congo Red (CR) removal. The research showed that protonation of the amino groups played a significant role in enhancing the CR adsorption in an acidic medium.
As a toxic azo anion dye, Congo Red (CR) in waste-water poses a potential threat to the environment and human health. An absorbent is often used for its removal, during which, however, the role played by the functional groups is still not fully understood. In this work, a boehmite aerogel with a specific surface area as high as 305 m(2)/g was successfully developed by a combined sol-gel and freeze-drying method, and its CR adsorption capacity reached as high as 1962 mg center dot g(-1). The adsorption process was dominated by a chemisorption mechanism and could be well described by the Langmuir isothermal model. The combination of the density functional theory (DFT) calculations and experimental results suggested that the amino protonation was responsible for the additional enhancement of CR adsorption in an acidic medium. The adsorption process occurred via interactions between boehmite aerogels and the -SO3 functional groups of CR. Additionally, the -NH3 group resultant from the protonation of -NH2 functional groups of CR in an acidic medium significantly enhanced the CR adsorption on the boehmite aerogels. This work not only developed an ultrahigh efficiency anion adsorbent for CR removal, but also provided a new strategy for the exploration of new adsorbents with further improved performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据