4.7 Article

A novel ?signal off-triggered on? Forster resonance energy transfer biosensor for the ratiometric detection of pathogenic bacteria

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132598

关键词

Fluorescence biosensor; FRET; Van-Au NCs; Ru(bpy)32+; S; aureus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education In- stitutions (PAPD)
  3. [21705062]
  4. [21305053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel signal off-triggered on FRET ratiometric fluorescent sensor was developed for the selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus. The sensor showed a wide linear range and low detection limit, and demonstrated satisfactory results in food samples and human serum.
Pathogenic bacterial infections pose a greatly threat to human health. Here, a novel signal off-triggered on Fo center dot rster resonance energy transfer (FRET) ratiometric fluorescent sensor was developed for the selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Dual-recognition units, vancomycin hydrochloride (Van) anchor and aptamer affinity, enabled this sensor to accurately recognize S. aureus from other bacteria. The spectral overlap between the absorption of gold nanoclusters (Au NCs) and the emission spectrum of Ru(bpy)32+ enabled the occurrence of signal off-triggered on FRET, in which Au NCs were used as the energy donor and Ru(bpy)32+ as the energy acceptor, accompanied with the fluorescence quenching of Au NCs at 450 nm (signal off readout mode) and the signal increase of Ru(bpy)32+ at 610 nm (signal on readout mode). By measuring the F450 nm/ F610 nm ratio, a wide linear range of 10 to 108 CFU/mL and a low detection limit of 1.0 CFU/mL were obtained for S. aureus. Satisfactory detection results in food samples and human serum, as well as ratiometric imaging of S. aureus, demonstrated the potential applications of the sensor in the early recognition of pathogenic microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据