4.7 Article

Multicolor fluorescence regulation of N doped silicon quantum dots and the multiple applications

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 376, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132978

关键词

N doped silicon quantum dots; Multicolor fluorescence; Fluorescence detection of Cu 2+; Solid-state fluorescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, N doped silicon quantum dots (N-SiQDs) with adjustable fluorescence colors were synthesized by controlling preparation conditions. The N-SiQDs were used as a fluorescent probe for the detection of Cu2+ in tap water and artificial cerebrospinal fluid, as well as for cell imaging and intracellular detection of Cu2+. The study also demonstrated the potential of N-SiQDs for optical device applications.
Currently-reported silicon quantum dots (SiQDs) usually have blue fluorescence, which limits its applications in biological fields, so it is of great significance to develop SiQDs with non-blue fluorescence, especially adjustable multicolor fluorescence. In this study, neutral red was selected as the dopant to prepare a series of N doped silicon quantum dots (N-SiQDs) with adjustable fluorescence colors from blue to orange by simply controlling preparation conditions. Due to the complexion between the N-SiQDs and Cu2+, the fluorescence of N-SiQDs was quenched, and thus N-SiQDs were employed as the fluorescent probe for the detection of Cu2+ in tap water and artificial cerebrospinal fluid with good selectivity, wide linear range (0.05-5 mu M) and low detection limit (0.02 mu M). In addition, the N-SiQDs were applicable to cell imaging and intracellular detection of Cu2+ as the orange fluorescence of the N-SiQDs could avoid background fluorescence interference from biological samples. Furthermore, N-SiQDs of varied fluorescence colors could be well solidified, exhibiting the potential for the optical device. The present study provided an easy-to-handle and effective way to synthesize multicolor fluo-rescent SiQDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据