4.6 Article

Fiber Loop Mirror Based on Optical Fiber Circulator for Sensing Applications

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23020618

关键词

optical fiber sensor; fiber loop mirror; birefringence; strain sensor; torsion sensor; optical circulator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a different Fiber Loop Mirror (FLM) configuration with two circulators, and demonstrates its use for strain and torsion discrimination. The configuration achieves high sensitivity in strain measurement and torsion characterization. It allows for control of the free spectral range (FSR) and achieving refractive index differences higher than 10(-2), making it essential for high sensitivity physical parameter sensors.
In this paper, a different Fiber Loop Mirror (FLM) configuration with two circulators is presented. This configuration is demonstrated and characterized for sensing applications. This new design concept was used for strain and torsion discrimination. For strain measurement, the interference fringe displacement has a sensitivity of (0.576 +/- 0.009) pm.mu epsilon(-1). When the FFT (Fast Fourier Transformer) is calculated and the frequency shift and signal amplitude are monitored, the sensitivities are (-2.1 +/- 0.3) x 10(-4) nm(-1) mu epsilon(-1) and (4.9 +/- 0.3) x 10(-7) mu epsilon(-1), respectively. For the characterization in torsion, an FFT peaks variation of (-2.177 +/- 0.002) x 10(-12) nm(-1)/degrees and an amplitude variation of (1.02 +/- 0.06) x 10(-3)/degrees are achieved. This configuration allows the use of a wide range of fiber lengths and with different refractive indices for controlling the free spectral range (FSR) and achieving refractive index differences, i.e., birefringence, higher than 10(-2), which is essential for the development of high sensitivity physical parameter sensors, such as operating on the Vernier effect. Furthermore, this FLM configuration allows the system to be balanced, which is not possible with traditional FLMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据