4.6 Article

Design of Airborne Large Aperture Infrared Optical System Based on Monocentric Lens

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22249907

关键词

optical design; mid-wave infrared; monocentric lens; large aperture; sensor array

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a solution to the design of airborne large aperture infrared optical systems based on a monocentric lens, which can meet the strict criteria of aerial reconnaissance UAVs. The system achieves a wide field of view and high image quality using a five-glass asymmetric monocentric lens. The research may facilitate the practical application of monocentric lenses in UAVs.
Conventional reconnaissance camera systems have been flown on manned aircraft, where the weight, size, and power requirements are not stringent. However, today, these parameters are important for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This article provides a solution to the design of airborne large aperture infrared optical systems, based on a monocentric lens that can meet the strict criteria of aerial reconnaissance UAVs for a wide field of view (FOV) and lightness of airborne electro-optical pod cameras. A monocentric lens has a curved image plane, consisting of an array of microsensors, which can provide an image with 368 megapixels over a 100 degrees FOV. We obtained the initial structure of a five-glass (5GS) asymmetric monocentric lens with an air gap, using ray-tracing and global optimization algorithms. According to the design results, the ground sampling distance (GSD) of the system is 0.33 m at 3000 m altitude. The full-field modulation transfer function (MTF) value of the system is more than 0.4 at a Nyquist frequency of 70 lp/mm. We present a primary thermal control method, and the image quality was steady throughout the operating temperature range. This compactness and simple structure fulfill the needs of uncrewed airborne lenses. This work may facilitate the practical application of monocentric lens in UAVs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据