4.6 Article

Dispatcher, Can You Help Me? A Woman Is Giving Birth. A Pilot Study of Remote Video Assistance with Smart Glasses

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23010409

关键词

technology; wearable; telemedicine; midwifery; natural childbirth; lifeguard; smart glasses; emergencies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smart glasses (SG) can provide important assistance in emergency situations. This study assessed the potential benefits of teleassistance through SG from a midwife to a lifeguard in a simulated out-of-hospital birth. The video assistance with SG improved the performance of lifeguards in following the protocol.
Smart glasses (SG) could be a breakthrough in emergency situations, so the aim of this work was to assess the potential benefits of teleassistance with smart glasses (SG) from a midwife to a lifeguard in a simulated, unplanned, out-of-hospital birth (OHB). Thirty-eight lifeguards were randomized into SG and control (CG) groups. All participants were required to act in a simulated imminent childbirth with a maternal-fetal simulator (PROMPT Flex, Laerdal, Norway). The CG acted autonomously, while the SG group was video-assisted by a midwife through SG (Vuzix Blade, New York, NY, USA). The video assistance was based on the OHB protocol, speaking and receiving images on the SG. The performance time, compliance with the protocol steps, and perceived performance with the SG were evaluated. The midwife's video assistance with SG allowed 35% of the SG participants to perform the complete OHB protocol. No CG participant was able to perform it (p = 0.005). All OHB protocol variables were significantly better in the SG group than in the CG (p < 0.05). Telemedicine through video assistance with SG is feasible so that a lifeguard with no knowledge of childbirth care can act according to the recommendations in a simulated, unplanned, uncomplicated OHB. Communication with the midwife by speaking and sending images to the SG is perceived as an important benefit to the performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据