4.6 Article

Impact of Initial Cyclic Loading on Mechanical Properties and Performance of Nafion

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23031488

关键词

Nafion; mechanical tests; viscoplastic properties; cyclic loading; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nafion is a highly suitable material for various applications due to its high ion-conductivity, hydrophilicity, and thermal and chemical stability. However, the mechanical properties of Nafion membrane, which are influenced by its viscoplastic characteristics, have a significant impact on the performance of Nafion-based sensors. This study investigates the mechanical properties of Nafion under cyclic loading and reveals a time-dependent recovery process that is strain-rate dependent. The weakening of the recovery behavior after multiple stress-strain cycles can be important for the future design of chemical and biological microsensors and nanosensors.
Nafion possesses many interesting properties such as a high ion-conductivity, hydrophilicity, and thermal and chemical stability that make this material highly suitable for many applications including fuel cells and various (bio-)chemical and physical sensors. However, the mechanical properties of a Nafion membrane that are known to be affected by the viscoplastic characteristics of the material itself have a strong impact on the performance of Nafion-based sensors. In this study, the mechanical properties of Nafion under the cyclic loading have been investigated in detail. After cyclic tensile loading (i.e., maximum elongation about 25% at a room temperature and relative humidity about 40%) a time-dependent recovery comes into play. This recovery process is also shown being strain-rate dependent. Our results reveal that the recovery behavior weakens after performing several stress-strain cycles. Present findings can be of a great importance in future design of various chemical and biological microsensors and nanosensors such as hydrogen or glucose ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据