4.6 Article

A Continuous Motion Shape-from-Focus Method for Geometry Measurement during 3D Printing

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22249805

关键词

focus variation; shape measurement; shape-from-focus; laser triangulation; topography; optical dimensional metrology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 3D printing, an accurate 3D measurement method is required to evaluate the quality of printed parts. This research presents a novel methodology that allows shape-from-focus to be used in a continuous scanning motion, making it applicable to the 3D manufacturing process.
In 3D printing, as in other manufacturing processes, there is a push for zero-defect manufacturing, mainly to avoid waste. To evaluate the quality of the printed parts during the printing process, an accurate 3D measurement method is required. By scanning the part during the buildup, potential nonconformities to tolerances can be detected early on and the printing process could be adjusted to avoid scrapping the part. Out of many, shape-from-focus, is an accurate method for recovering 3D shapes from objects. However, the state-of-the-art implementation of the method requires the object to be stationary during a measurement. This does not reconcile with the nature of 3D printing, where continuous motion is required for the manufacturing process. This research presents a novel methodology that allows shape-from-focus to be used in a continuous scanning motion, thus making it possible to apply it to the 3D manufacturing process. By controlling the camera trigger and a tunable lens with synchronous signals, a stack of images can be created while the camera or the object is in motion. These images can be re-aligned and then used to create a 3D depth image. The impact on the quality of the 3D measurement was tested by analytically comparing the quality of a scan using the traditional stationary method and of the proposed method to a known reference. The results demonstrate a 1.22% degradation in the measurement error.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据