4.6 Article

Generalized Scale Factor Calibration Method for an Off-Axis Digital Image Correlation-Based Video Deflectometer

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s222410010

关键词

off-axis digital image correlation; scale factor; calibration; displacement measurement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. [12102402]
  4. [11925202]
  5. [2652019016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a generalized SF calibration model based on a distortion-free pinhole imaging model was proposed for high-quality displacement measurement in off-axis DIC-based video deflectometer. The experimental results demonstrated that under specific conditions, this method can provide more accurate results.
When using off-axis digital image correlation (DIC) for non-contact, remote, and multipoint deflection monitoring of engineering structures, accurate calibration of the scale factor (SF), which converts image displacement to physical displacement for each measurement point, is critical to realize high-quality displacement measurement. In this work, based on the distortion-free pinhole imaging model, a generalized SF calibration model is proposed for an off-axis DIC-based video deflectometer. Then, the transversal relationship between the proposed SF calibration method and three commonly used SF calibration methods was discussed. The accuracy of these SF calibration methods was also compared using indoor rigid body translation experiments. It is proved that the proposed method can be degraded to one of the existing calibration methods in most cases, but will provide more accurate results under the following four conditions: (1) the camera's pitch angle is more than 20 degrees, (2) the focal length is more than 25 mm, (3) the pixel size of the camera sensor is more than 5 um, and (4) the image y-coordinate corresponding to the measurement point after deformation is far from the image center.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据