Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation: A Review

Supervised image-to-image translation has been proven to generate realistic images with sharp details and to have good quantitative performance. Such methods are trained on a paired dataset, where an image from the source domain already has a corresponding translated image in the target domain. However, this paired dataset requirement imposes a huge practical constraint, requires domain knowledge or is even impossible to obtain in certain cases. Due to these problems, unsupervised image-to-image translation has been proposed, which does not require domain expertise and can take advantage of a large unlabeled dataset. Although such models perform well, they are hard to train due to the major constraints induced in their loss functions, which make training unstable. Since CycleGAN has been released, numerous methods have been proposed which try to address various problems from different perspectives. In this review, we firstly describe the general image-to-image translation framework and discuss the datasets and metrics involved in the topic. Furthermore, we revise the current state-of-the-art with a classification of existing works. This part is followed by a small quantitative evaluation, for which results were taken from papers.

Automated summary

This article introduces the supervised and unsupervised methods of image-to-image translation and their advantages and disadvantages. It also classifies and revises the current state-of-the-art methods, and conducts a quantitative evaluation of these methods.