4.7 Article

γ-Aminobutyric acid treatments of pomegranate trees increase crop yield and fruit quality at harvest

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 309, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111633

关键词

GABA; Punica granatum; Phenolics; Colour; Anthocyanins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GABA treatment applied as foliar spray at key points of fruit development in pomegranate trees can increase crop yield and improve fruit quality. The highest effects were observed when applying GABA at a concentration of 100 mM, which increased fruit yield and intensified the red colour of the skin and arils. The treatment also increased the concentration of total phenolics and anthocyanins in the fruit.
gamma-Aminobutyric (GABA) is a non-protein amino acid that has been reported to affect different plant developmental processes, including delay of fruit senescence and maintenance of quality when applied as postharvest treatment. In this experiment, GABA treatments (10, 50 and 100 mM) were applied by foliar spray to 'Mollar de Elche' pomegranate trees at three key points of fruit development. Results showed that GABA treatments increased crop yield in a dose-dependent way, this effect being due to a higher number of fruit harvested per tree. In addition, GABA treatments led to a deeper red colour of pomegranate skin and arils, the highest effects being observed for 100 mM dose. Total phenolic and total anthocyanin concentrations were also increased by GABA treatment, while other quality parameters such as total soluble solids, total acidity or firmness were not affected by treatments. Then, GABA preharvest treatment, applied at 100 mM, could be a useful tool to increase the economic profit of pomegranate crop, since higher yield and fruit with higher colour were obtained, which is an important quality parameter for this cultivar. In addition, aril total phenolics and anthocyanin content were increased, which would lead to enhance the antioxidant properties and health benefits for consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据