4.7 Article

How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 852, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401

关键词

Carbon emissions; Carbon peak; Digital economy; Mediating effect

资金

  1. Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China
  2. Jiangsu Soft Science Fund
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. Major research project of Jiangsu Key Labora-tory of Coal-based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization
  5. [21ZDA086]
  6. [BR2022007]
  7. [71974188]
  8. [2020ZDZZ03C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the digital economy has a significant impact on carbon emissions, reducing carbon emission intensity but increasing per capita carbon emissions. Economic growth, financial development, and industrial structure upgrading play mediating roles between the digital economy and carbon emissions.
The digital economy is of great significant for countries to achieve carbon neutrality and carbon peak. Using country -level panel data from 2008 to 2018, this study empirically examined the impact of the development of the digital econ-omy on carbon emissions and the associated transmission mechanisms by using the intermediary effect model. Our main findings are as follows. (1) The level of digital economy development varies greatly between countries, and the difference between hyper-digitalized countries and under-connected countries is increasingly obvious. (2) Development of the digital economy significantly reduces the carbon emission intensity, but promotes increases in the per capita carbon emissions. (3) Analysis shows that economic growth, financial development, and industrial structure upgrading play mediating roles between the digital economy and carbon emissions. Our study not only ad-vances the study on digital economy and carbon emissions, but also provides a significant reference for policy makers to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据