4.7 Article

Plastic debris as a mobile source of additive chemicals in marine environments: In-situ evidence

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 856, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158893

关键词

Plastic debris; Bioaccumulation; Plastic additives; Moving source; Marine environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plastic debris can serve as a significant source of hazardous chemicals in the ocean, and its role in the environment is still not fully understood. A comprehensive field study comparing highly contaminated and non-contaminated islands revealed that stranded plastics play a crucial role in the bioaccumulation of plastic additives in marine debris-contaminated areas. This study provides the first field evidence that plastic debris movement in the ocean contributes to the dispersal of plastic additives to pristine waters.
Plastic debris can act as a source of hazardous chemicals in the ocean, but the significance of its role in the environment is not yet known. To address this question, a comprehensive field study of highly contaminated and non-contaminated islands was conducted. Comparison of the plastic additive hexabromocyclododecanes and ubiquitous contaminants polychlorinated biphenyls in marine invertebrates showed that the load of stranded plastics plays a significant role in the bioaccumulation of plastic additives in the marine debris-contaminated island. Fugacity analysis indicates that net flow of hexabromocyclododecanes occurred from plastics to environmental reservoirs. Additionally, significantly higher levels of antioxidants, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol and butylated hydroxytoluene, was found in the marine invertebrates inhabiting the marine debris-contaminated island than those inhabiting the marine debris-noncontaminated island, but ultraviolet stabilizers did not show the regional difference. This study provides the first field evidence that the move-ment of plastic debris in the ocean drives the dispersal of plastic additives to pristine waters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据