4.7 Review

Pretreatment methods for monitoring microplastics in soil and freshwater sediment samples: A comprehensive review

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 871, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161718

关键词

Environment; Microplastics; Pretreatment methods; Soil; Freshwater sediment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the pretreatment methods currently used for microplastics (MPs) analysis in soil and freshwater sediments. It includes sample processing, pretreatment, and characterization methods, as well as analytical tools, MPs characteristics, and quantity. Although the advantages of each pretreatment method have been investigated, it is still challenging to determine a universal pretreatment method due to sample variability. Standard pretreatment methods are highly required for various environmental matrices.
This paper reviews the currently used pretreatment methods for microplastics (MPs) analysis in soil and freshwater sed-iments, primarily sample processing, pretreatment, and characterization methods for MPs analysis. In addition, analytical tools (e.g., lab instruments), MPs characteristics, and MPs quantity, are included in this review. Prior to pretreatment, soil and sediment samples are typically processed using sieving and drying methods, and a sample quantity of <50 g was mostly used for the pretreatment. Density separation was commonly performed before organic matter removal. Sodium chloride (NaCl) and zinc chloride (ZnCl2) were most often used for density separation, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) ox-idation was most frequently used to remove organic matter. Although advantages of each pretreatment method have been investigated, it is still challenging to determine a universal pretreatment method due to sample variability (e.g., sample characteristics). Furthermore, it is highly required to establish standard pretreatment methods that can be used for various environmental matrices, including air, water, and wastes as well as soil and sediment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据