4.7 Article

Tomato waste biochar in the framework of circular economy

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 871, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161959

关键词

Tomato waste; Pyrolysis; Biochars; Activated biochars; Characterization; Thermogravimetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tomato pomace was pyrolyzed at 350℃ and 550℃ and chemically activated at 800℃ to produce two biochars named B350 and B550, as well as two new materials named BA350 and BA550. The results showed that higher pyrolysis temperature and chemical activation increased the specific surface area of the biochars. This suggests that biochars from tomato waste can be used as organic amendment to improve soil fertility and serve as water reservoirs in arid areas.
Tomato pomace was slowly pyrolyzed at 350 and 550 degrees C (under an N-2 flow of 50 L/h) at a rate of 6 degrees C/min and a res-idence time of 1:30 h to produce two biochars named B350 and B550, respectively. In addition, the two biochars were chemically activated with Kappa Omicron Eta (at a ratio of 1:10 w/v) at 800 degrees C to produce two new materials named BA350 and BA550. The four biochars produced were characterized physically and chemically (pH, yield, calorific value). They were also analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (B.E.T), elemental analysis (EA), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that as the pyrolysis temperature increased (350 to 550 degrees C), the specific surface area (SSA) increased. The latter was also significantly increased by the activation process. EA showed a variation in the mineral content of the produced biochars, resulting in a different content of the biochars after activation. The parameters studied showed that biochars from tomato waste could be used as an organic amend-ment to improve soil fertility in agricultural. In addition, because of their ability to absorb water, they could be used as a water reservoir in soils in arid areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据