4.6 Review

Improving performance of robots using human-inspired approaches: a survey

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-022-3606-1

关键词

human-inspired intelligent robots; brain-inspired intelligence; decision making; visual cognition; musculoskeletal robots

资金

  1. Major Project of Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence [2021ZD0200408]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91948303, 62203443]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB32050100]
  4. Science Foundation for Youth of the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex System [2022QN09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Realizing high performance of ordinary robots is a core problem in robotic research. Developing human-inspired robotic systems and algorithms is a promising avenue to improve the performance of robotic systems.
Realizing high performance of ordinary robots is one of the core problems in robotic research. Improving the performance of ordinary robots usually relies on the collaborative development of multiple research fields, resulting in high costs and difficulty to complete some high-precision tasks. As a comparison, humans can realize extraordinary overall performance under the condition of limited computational-energy consumption and low absolute precision in sensing and controlling each body unit. Therefore, developing human-inspired robotic systems and algorithms is a promising avenue to improve the performance of robotic systems. In this review, the cutting-edge research work on human-inspired intelligent robots in decision-making, cognition, motion control, and system design is summarized from behavior- and neural-inspired aspects. This review aims to provide a significant insight into human-inspired intelligent robots, which may be beneficial for promoting the integration of neuroscience, machinery, and control, so as to develop a new generation of robotic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据