4.5 Article

High School and College Students' Graph-Interpretation Competence in Scientific and Daily Contexts of Data Visualization

期刊

SCIENCE & EDUCATION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-022-00406-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan [NSTC108-2628-H-003-001-MY3]
  2. Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study surveyed the graph-interpretation competence of 183 college and senior high school students in scientific and daily contexts. The findings revealed significant differences in graph interpretation competence across educational levels. Furthermore, there was a relationship between students' graph interpretation competence in scientific and daily contexts.
This study surveyed 183 college and senior high school students' graph-interpretation competence in scientific and daily contexts. Specifically, whether students' graph interpretation in scientific and daily contexts differed across educational levels was investigated. Furthermore, the questions of whether students' graph interpretation competence in scientific contexts might predict their graph interpretation in daily contexts were explored. Other factors including age and gender were also considered and examined to discern significant factor(s) predicting graph interpretation competence in daily contexts. Results indicated that there were statistically significant differences across educational levels in terms of graph interpretation competence in both scientific and daily contexts. Furthermore, the students' graph interpretation competence was related between scientific and daily contexts. The important factors predicting students' graph interpretation in daily contexts include age and graph-interpretation in scientific literacy. Implications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据