4.8 Article

A multivalent nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine against all known influenza virus subtypes

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 378, 期 6622, 页码 899-904

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abm0271

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Department of Health and Human Services [75N93021C00015, 75N93019C00050, 1R01AI108686, R56AI150677]
  4. Training in Emerging Infectious Diseases [T32AI055400]
  5. Burroughs Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is important to develop a vaccine that can provide cross-reactive and subtype-specific antibodies as seasonal influenza vaccines offer limited protection against pandemic influenza virus strains. This study developed a multivalent vaccine using nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding hemagglutinin antigens from all known influenza virus subtypes, which elicited high levels of antibodies in mice and ferrets that reacted to multiple antigens. Vaccination with this mRNA vaccine protected mice and ferrets from both matched and mismatched viral strains.
Seasonal influenza vaccines offer little protection against pandemic influenza virus strains. It is difficult to create effective prepandemic vaccines because it is uncertain which influenza virus subtype will cause the next pandemic. In this work, we developed a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA)- lipid nanoparticle vaccine encoding hemagglutinin antigens from all 20 known influenza A virus subtypes and influenza B virus lineages. This multivalent vaccine elicited high levels of cross-reactive and subtype-specific antibodies in mice and ferrets that reacted to all 20 encoded antigens. Vaccination protected mice and ferrets challenged with matched and mismatched viral strains, and this protection was at least partially dependent on antibodies. Our studies indicate that mRNA vaccines can provide protection against antigenically variable viruses by simultaneously inducing antibodies against multiple antigens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据