4.5 Article

First demonstration of a fiber optic bolometer on a tokamak plasma (invited)

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 93, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099546

关键词

-

资金

  1. US DOE [DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FC02-04ER54698]
  2. Commonwealth Fusion Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the first observation of a fusion plasma using a fiber optic bolometer. The fiber optic bolometer shows high sensitivity to temperature changes and negligible susceptibility to electromagnetic interference, making it suitable for tokamak environments. The comparison with resistive bolometers confirms the comparable performance of the fiber optic bolometer.
A fiber optic bolometer (FOB) was demonstrated observing a fusion plasma for the first time at the DIII-D tokamak. A FOB uses a fiber optics-based interferometric technique that is designed to have a high sensitivity to temperature changes [75 mK/(W/m(2)) responsivity in high vacuum with 0.38 mK noise level] with a negligible susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI) that can be problematic for resistive bolometers in a tokamak environment. A single-channel test apparatus was installed on DIII-D consisting of a measurement FOB and shielded reference FOB. The single-channel FOB showed a negligible increase in the noise level during typical plasma operations (0.39 mK) compared to the benchtop results (0.38 mK), confirming an insignificant EMI impact to the FOB. Comparisons to DIII-D resistive bolometers showed good agreement with the single-channel FOB, indicating that the FOB is comparable to a resistive bolometer when the impulse calibration is applied. The noise-equivalent power density of the calibrated FOB during a plasma operation was 0.55 W/m(2) with an average sampling time of 20 ms. The major potential effect of ionizing radiation on the FOB would be the radiation-induced attenuation, which can be efficiently compensated for by adjusting the probing light power. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据