4.4 Article

Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion and subsequent mangrove restoration on soil nitrogen mineralization in Quangang, China

期刊

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13833

关键词

inorganic nitrogen; Kandelia obovata; mangrove restoration; soil nitrogen mineralization rate; Spartina alterniflora

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the invasion effect of Spartina alterniflora on coastal mangrove ecosystems and the restoration effect of mangrove wetlands from the perspective of nitrogen cycle characteristics. The results show that Spartina alterniflora invasion does not enhance soil nitrogen mineralization but uses more NH4+-N relative to mangrove communities in germination and growing seasons.
The Spartina alterniflora has severely invaded the coastal mangrove ecosystems in China. Here, we attempt to evaluate the invasion effect of S. alterniflora and the restoration effect of mangrove wetlands from the perspective of the nitrogen cycle characteristics. The inorganic nitrogen content, soil nitrogen mineralization, ammonification, and nitrification rate of uninvaded mudflats with those of invaded S. alterniflora site and native Kandelia obovata site at different restoration stages were compared. The results showed that the NH4+-N was the dominant form of soil inorganic nitrogen at all sites. Owing to its higher ammonification rates, the nitrogen mineralization rates at S. alterniflora site were highest in spring and summer among all sites except for mudflat. The young mangrove (1 year and 8 years) had significantly higher soil inorganic nitrogen content but lower nitrogen mineralization than the mature mangrove, indicated the short-term response to restoration. The S. alterniflora invasion did not enhance soil nitrogen mineralization comparing with preinvaded mudflat, but it used more NH4+-N relative to K. obovata due to its higher soil nitrogen mineralization than mangrove communities in germination and growing seasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据