4.4 Article

Effect of freeze-dried quail egg white and yolk addition to semen extender on viability of rooster sperm stored for 6 h at 4°C

期刊

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 450-458

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rda.14307

关键词

motility; quail egg yolk; rooster; semen extenders; sperm morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of adding freeze-dried quail egg white and yolk to basic EK extender on the morphology and motility of chicken broiler breeder semen was investigated.Study found that the addition of 200 mg/ml of egg white and 100 mg/ml of egg yolk to the EK extender resulted in the highest number of live normal sperm, while the neat semen had the highest sperm motility.
The effect of freeze-dried quail egg white and yolk addition to basic EK extender on morphology and motility of chicken broiler breeder semen was investigated. Fresh pooled semen was divided into eight parts: fresh, undiluted (control), diluted in 1:2 ratio (v/v) with basic EK extender, EK + 200 mg/ml of egg white, EK + 100 mg/ml of egg white, EK + 50 mg/ml of egg white, EK + 100 mg/ml of egg yolk, EK + 50 mg/ml of egg yolk, EK + 25 mg/ml of egg yolk. Semen samples were evaluated 15 min after dilution and after 6 h of storage at 4 degrees C. In the fresh semen, the number of live normal sperm was the highest in semen diluted with EK + 200 mg of egg white and EK + 100 mg of egg yolk, while the highest sperm motility was in the neat semen. Semen storage reduced the number of normal sperm in all analysed semen samples. In the neat semen, the number of normal sperm decreased, in relation to the fresh not-stored samples, by 36.8% (from 72.3% to 35.5%), with EK extender by 9.2%, in samples enriched with egg white, from 8.4% (EK + 200 mg) to 10.0% (EK + 100 mg), and in EK with egg yolk addition, from 1.2% (EK + 50 mg) to 10.6% (EK + 100 mg). The highest percentage of motile sperm was observed in EK extender enriched with 50 mg of egg white (77.1%) and EK + 25 mg of egg yolk (65.3%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据