4.7 Article

Assessing a soil-removed semi-empirical model for estimating leaf chlorophyll content

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113284

关键词

Leaf chlorophyll content; Physical model; Semi-empirical model; LICI; Soil effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42101360, 41871259, 32021004, 31725020]
  2. Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral Talent [2022ZB333]
  3. Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2022M710070, 2022T150327]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. National Science Foundation through the NEON Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial indicator of nitrogen status and photosynthetic capacity. A recent study developed a simple model, called LAI-insensitive chlorophyll index (LICI), to accurately estimate LCC. They also proposed an automatic algorithm to separate soil and vegetation, which improved the accuracy of LICI measurements. The results showed that the soil-removed LICI-based model had high accuracy and generality for LCC estimation across various vegetation types, years, and sites.
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is an important indicator of foliar nitrogen status and photosynthetic capacity. Compared to physical models, the generality of empirical models based on vegetation indices is often questioned when they are used to estimate LCC due to the influence from canopy structure, such as leaf area index (LAI). A recent study developed the LAI-insensitive chlorophyll index (LICI) and established a semi-empirical LICI-based LCC quantification model, which inherits both the robustness of physical models and the simplicity of empirical models. However, it is unclear whether such a simple model is as accurate and generic as physical models. Here, we adopted an innovative approach to disentangle the confounding effects of LAI and LCC on LICI and found that LICI was strongly correlated to LCC but only marginally sensitive to LAI. Moreover, we also found that LICI was sensitive to the soil background and thus proposed a spectral separation of soil and vegetation (3SV) algorithm, which is automatic and does not require prior information of soil background. After implementing the 3SV al-gorithm to remove the contributed reflectance of soil, we then obtained the contributed reflectance of vegetation (CRv). Model simulations showed that the soil background effect on the CRv-derived LICI was largely eliminated and hence this index was viewed to be soil-removed. As a result, the accuracy and generality of the soil-removed LICI-based model for LCC estimation was evaluated using comprehensive datasets from multiple vegetation types, years, sites, and observation platforms and compared to that of a MatrixVI-based physical model and a MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI)-based semi-empirical model. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) for LCC estimated by the soil-removed LICI-based model was 6.22-6.87 mu g/cm2 for the crop datasets and 10.68 mu g/ cm2 for the multi-ecosystem dataset when the equivalent wet soil fraction was <0.7. Although further efforts are required to mitigate the effects of soil on the LICI-based model over sparse vegetation, this research is highly beneficial for extending its potential applications to the globe and advancing the development of an operational LCC monitoring system in the emerging satellite hyperspectral era.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据