4.7 Article

Supply reliability analysis of natural gas pipeline network based on demand-side economic loss risk

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108961

关键词

Economic risk analysis; Natural gas pipeline network; Gas supply reliability; Supply priority order; Alternative energy source

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an evaluation method for gas supply reliability based on demand-side economic risk. The user's supply sequence is integrated into the cost matrix to optimize the distribution of demand flow under gas shortage. A calculation model for economic loss cost is established, and a reliability index based on economic risk is used to evaluate supply security.
Most studies on the natural gas supply reliability evaluation have reflected on whether the volume of gas supply to users is sufficient. However, different types of users suffer from the same natural gas shortage, the consequences of loss are different. The abundance of the supplied gas volumes does not reflect the actual losses incurred by users. Moreover, when a gas shortage occurs, the supply flow of different types of users is redistributed according to the supply order. Therefore, this study proposes an evaluation method for the gas supply reliability based on demand-side economic risk. The user's supply sequence is integrated into the cost matrix to optimize the distribution of the user's demand flow under gas shortage. A calculation model of the economic loss cost is established using alternative energy sources. Finally, a reliability index is established based on economic risk to evaluate the degree of supply security. The results showed that the reliability based on the economic risk assessment was slightly higher than that based on the gas quantity assessment. The reliabilities were 99.988% and 99.991%, respectively. The economic risk is reduced and the reliability is improved for the important users after considering the influence of the demand-side supply order.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据