4.7 Article

A convex two-dimensional variable selection method for the root-cause diagnostics of product defects

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108827

关键词

Fault/defect diagnostics; Quality control; Penalized matrix regression; Group lasso; Sparsity; Generalized linear model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diagnosis of product quality defects in multistage manufacturing processes often requires identifying crucial stages and process variables related to product anomalies. Existing models have limitations, and this article proposes a novel convex two-dimensional variable selection method to address these challenges by considering both group-wise and element-wise sparsity.
Many multistage manufacturing processes consist of multiple identical stages. The root cause diagnostic of the product quality defects of these processes often involves the simultaneous identification of crucial stages and process variables that are related to product anomalies. In the literature, this is typically achieved by using penalized matrix regression that regresses the index of product defect against a matrix whose rows and columns respectively represent the stages and process variables. However, most existing models have some limitations that compromise their applicability and/or performance. For example, some models have an assumption on the rank of the coefficient, which often cannot be satisfied; some others formulate a nonconvex optimization criterion that easily results in a local optimum. Also, most models only provide diagnostics results with groupwise (i.e., stage- and variable-wise) sparsity. To address these challenges, this article proposes a novel convex two-dimensional variable selection method that can inspire both group-wise and element-wise sparsity. This is accomplished by proposing a new generalized matrix regression model and simultaneously penalizing the rows, columns, and elements of the regression coefficient matrix using an l(2), l(2), and l(1) norm, respectively. Simulated and real-world data are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据