4.7 Article

Deep transfer learning based on Bi-LSTM and attention for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearing

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108914

关键词

Rolling bearings; Remaining useful life prediction; Feature distribution; Domain adaptive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel method for remaining useful life (RUL) prediction with more refined transfer by adding failure behavior judgment. A failure behavior judgment method is proposed using the convolutional autoencoder (CAE) and Pearson correlation coefficient. Then, a multi-channel transfer network is proposed for extracting multi-scale features of bearing degradation, and a domain adaptive structure is added to reduce the difference in feature distribution between training and test bearing data.
Many transfer learning methods focus on training models between domains with large differences. However, the data feature distribution varies greatly in different bearing degradation processes, which affects the prediction accuracy of Remaining useful life (RUL). To solve this problem, a novel method for RUL prediction with more refined transfer is proposed, which added failure behavior judgment. Firstly, a failure behavior judgment method is proposed by using the convolutional autoencoder (CAE) and Pearson correlation coefficient to determine whether the bearing fails gradually or suddenly. Then, a multi-channel transfer network is proposed for extracting multi-scale features of bearing degradation. Each channel uses convolutional network and bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) to extract global and temporal information. To reduce the difference in feature distribution between the training and test bearing data, a domain adaptive structure is added after feature fusion in each channel to enable the model to learn domain invariant features. By applying this method to experimental data and comparing it with other methods, the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据