4.7 Article

Predetermined standby mode transfers in 1-out-of-N systems with resource-constrained elements

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108849

关键词

Standby system; Mission downtime; Limited resource; Mode transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the optimal standby mode transfer problem considering resource-constrained system elements. A new event transition-based algorithm is proposed to evaluate the expected mission downtime (EMD) of the considered standby system subject to mode transfers. Experimental results show that the EMD decreases with the increase of initial available resource, while it increases with the increase of resource consumption or stress level during mode transfers.
It has been shown that mode transfers can effectively balance the resource consumption and restoration time of standby systems. However, the existing methods assumed unlimited resource in each element, which is not practical for many real-world systems. This work advances the state of the art by considering resource -constrained system elements, which have some maximum lifetime due to resource depletion during the mission. The optimal element standby mode transfer problem is formulated and solved, which determines the mode transfer schedule minimizing the expected mission downtime (EMD). The solution methodology encom-passes a new event transition-based numerical algorithm for evaluating the EMD of the considered 1-out-of -N standby system subject to mode transfers. Through the detailed analysis of a sensor standby system, it is revealed that the EMD decreases and the scheduled warm to hot mode transfer time increases as the element's initial available resource increases; the EMD increases as the element's resource consumption or stress level during the mode transfer increases; the EMD and its fraction in the mission time increases as the mission time increases; and it is beneficial to put the element with the smallest initial available resource into operation first.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据