4.3 Article

Z-TRAPEZOIDAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR MULTI-OBJECTIVE HAZMAT ROUTING MODEL WITH TIME WINDOWS

期刊

RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 4229-4250

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/ro/2022197

关键词

Vehicle routing problem with time windows; hazardous material; risk; Z-number

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hazardous material transportation is an integral part of the industry with significant financial and health risks. A multi-objective Hazmat routing model with time windows is used to optimize transportation, minimizing both risk and distance. To handle the uncertainty of Hazmat transportation risk, a Z-number fuzzy approach is applied, considering the probability of occurrence and severity. A multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm is used to solve the proposed model, which is validated using Solomon's problems. The efficiency of the suggested fuzzy problem is further analyzed through a case study of Hazmat distribution in Iran.
Hazardous material (Hazmat) transportation is an inseparable section of the industry, despite its major financial and health risks. In order to optimize Hazmat transportation, a multi-objective Hazmat routing model with time windows is employed where the risk and distance are minimized. Due to the uncertainty of Hazmat transportation risk, a Z-number fuzzy approach is used to estimate the risk, in which the probability of occurrence and the severity is considered in the context of Z-information. The severity of the event includes the affected population and depends on the amount of transported Hazmat and the number of individuals affected by the explosion. To tackle the proposed model, the present paper utilizes a multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm, the validity of which is tested by Solomon's problems. Furthermore, the optimization of a case study concerning the Hazmat distribution in Iran is analyzed using the suggested approach to assess the efficiency of the proposed fuzzy problem in real-world applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据