相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Patients and clinicians define symptom levels and meaningful change for PROMIS pain interference and fatigue in RA using bookmarking
Clifton O. Bingham et al.
RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
Tahira Devji et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)
Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management?
Madeleine T. King et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2019)
Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
Informing a priori Sample Size Estimation in Qualitative Concept Elicitation Interview Studies for Clinical Outcome Assessment Instrument Development
Diane M. Turner-Bowker et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2018)
Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee
Janghee Park et al.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2018)
The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)
Systematic Review: Issues in Measuring Clinically Meaningful Change in Self-Reported Chronic Pediatric Pain Intensity
John V. Lavigne
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Implicit Theories of Change and Stability Moderate Effects of Subjective Distance on the Remembered Self
Cindy L. P. Ward et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN (2015)
Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
Peter M. Fayers et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Should Linking Replace Regression When Mapping from Profile-Based Measures to Preference-Based Measures?
Peter M. Fayers et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2014)
The Future of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology
Dinesh Khanna et al.
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2011)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied minimally important change values
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Responsiveness of NEI VFQ-25 to Changes in Visual Acuity in Neovascular AMD: Validation Studies from Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials
Ivan J. Suner et al.
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Validity of patient-reported health-related quality of life global ratings of change using structural equation modeling
Stacie M. Metz et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
Response shift theory: Important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability
Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2007)
Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship
Nancy Schindler et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2007)
The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures
J Schmitt et al.
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION (2005)
Setting standards on educational tests
JJ Norcini
MEDICAL EDUCATION (2003)
分享论文
