4.5 Article

How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures

Caroline B. Terwee et al.

Summary: The minimal important change (MIC) is defined as a threshold for a minimal within-person change over time; estimation of MIC values should be conducted using appropriate methods, with current studies suggesting a reasonable range of 2-6 T-score points for PROMIS measures.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Unlike ROC analysis, a new IRT method identified clinical thresholds unbiased by disease prevalence

Berend Terluin et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

Tim P. Morris et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores

Cheryl D. Coon et al.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)

Article Medical Informatics

Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments

Cheryl D. Coon et al.

THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis

Berend Terluin et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences

Peter M. Fayers et al.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)

Article Orthopedics

Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders

A. Escobar et al.

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2013)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

Dennis Revicki et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A critical look at transition ratings

GH Guyatt et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)