相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2021)
Unlike ROC analysis, a new IRT method identified clinical thresholds unbiased by disease prevalence
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
Tahira Devji et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)
Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
Tim P. Morris et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2019)
Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review
Ahmad Ousmen et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2018)
Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
Peter M. Fayers et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2014)
Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders
A. Escobar et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2013)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
A critical look at transition ratings
GH Guyatt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)