4.3 Article

Creating a quadruple aim model for nursing education

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 448-455

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phn.13172

关键词

curriculum; models; nursing education; nursing workforce; public health nursing competencies; public health nursing education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Baccalaureate nursing education is adopting new standards that focus on population health and healthcare technologies. A Quadruple Aim for Nursing Education Model has been developed to bridge the gap between population health concepts and nursing informatics, and to prepare future nurses effectively and efficiently.
Baccalaureate nursing education is moving to adopt the new American Association of Colleges of Nursing Essentials for Professional Nursing Education. As identified in two of the six domains of the essentials, graduates need to be prepared to address population health and utilize informatics and healthcare technologies. Community/public health nursing also has eight domains for generalist nurses linked to population health which will help prepare a skilled nursing workforce for the 21st century. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim which evolved into the Quadruple Aim is focused on improving health outcomes within healthcare delivery. Through a literature review, a need for a Quadruple Aim model for nursing education was identified. Mirroring the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim for healthcare delivery, a Quadruple Aim for Nursing Education Model was developed. The model dimensions include (1) Population-focused Care, (2) Maximize Student Learning Experience, (3) Cost-effective Pedagogy, and (4) Nurse Educator Well-being. The Quadruple Aim for Nursing Education Model supports nursing education to prepare future nurses effectively and efficiently bridging population health concepts and issues with nursing informatics. Nurse educators are encouraged to utilize the model to transform nursing education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据