4.5 Review

Structural and functional features of treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and exploratory coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13530

关键词

depression; functional magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; treatment-resistant depression; voxel-based morphometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Around one-third of patients with major depressive disorder do not see significant improvement in their symptoms even after adequate treatment with two different antidepressant medications. This condition, known as treatment-resistant depression (TRD), severely impacts the quality of life of millions of people worldwide, leading to long-lasting interpersonal problems and social costs. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies indicates that frontal, cerebellar, and brainstem functions may be involved in the pathophysiology of TRD, although the heterogeneity and limitations of the available literature restrict the generalizability of the findings.
ObjectivesA third of people suffering from major depressive disorder do not experience a significant improvement in their symptoms even after adequate treatment with two different antidepressant medications. This common condition, termed treatment-resistant depression (TRD), severely affects the quality of life of millions of people worldwide, causing long-lasting interpersonal problems and social costs. Given its epidemiological and clinical relevance and the little consensus on whether the neurobiological underpinnings of TRD differ from treatment-sensitive depression (TSD), we sought to highlight the convergent morphometric and functional neuroimaging correlates of TRD. MethodsWe systematically reviewed the published literature on structural and resting-state functional neuroimaging of TRD compared to TSD and healthy controls (HC) and performed exploratory coordinate-based meta-analyses (CBMA) of significant results separately for each modality and multimodally (all-effects). CBMAs were also performed for each direction and combining both directions of group contrasts. ResultsOut of the initial 1929 studies, only eight involving 555 participants (189 patients with TRD, 156 with TSD, and 210 HC) were included. In all-effects CBMA, precentral/superior frontal gyrus showed a significant difference between TRD and HC. Functional and structural imaging meta-analyses did not yield statistically significant results. A marginally significant cluster of altered intrinsic activity was found between TRD and HC in the cerebellum/pons. ConclusionsFrontal, cerebellar, and brainstem functions can be involved in the pathophysiology of TRD. However, the design and heterogeneity of the (scarce) published literature hinder the generalizability of the findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据