4.3 Review

Cardiac changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats: Modulation by aerobic exercise

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 109-124

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.11.001

关键词

Hypertension; Aerobic exercise; Oxidative stress; Inflammation; Cardiac hypertrophy; Contractility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic arterial hypertension is a clinical condition characterized by high and sustained levels of blood pressure. Research on spontaneously hypertensive animals has provided insights into the physiological changes that affect the heart in hypertension. Aerobic exercise has shown to improve cardiac function and reduce inflammation and oxidative stress in the heart, although the precise mechanisms are not fully understood. This review provides an overview of the pathological changes in the heart of spontaneously hypertensive animals and the modulatory effects of aerobic exercise.
Systemic arterial hypertension is a multifactorial clinical condition characterized by high and sustained levels of blood pressure. For a better understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertension, studies are conducted with spontaneously hypertensive animals, which allow the investigation of physiological changes that in most cases cannot be studied in humans. In these animals, myocardial remodeling, increased pro-inflammatory markers, redox imbalance and contractile dysfunctions that lead to changes in cardiac function can be observed. However, it can be inferring that aerobic training improves cardiac function and cardiomyocyte contractility, in addition to controlling inflammation and reducing oxidative stress in cardiac muscle, despite this, the precise mechanisms by which physical exercise improves cardiovascular control are not fully understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the pathophysiological changes that affect the heart of spontaneously hypertensive animals and their modulation by aerobic exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据