4.7 Article

Poisoning and regeneration of commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst in coal-fired power plants

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 971-992

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.066

关键词

Coal-fired flue gas; Commercial SCR catalysts; Poisoning; Regeneration; TiO2

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006245]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2021RC4006]
  3. Environmental Protection Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment
  4. Postgraduate Research Innovation Project of Central South University [2022ZZTS0547]
  5. High Performance Computing Center of Central South University
  6. Innovation -Driven Project of Central South University [2020CX008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper comprehensively and systematically reviews the composition, deNOx characteristics, poisoning, and regeneration of commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 SCR catalyst, based on recent studies. It has important guiding significance for poisoning study and regeneration technology development of commercial SCR catalysts.
The NOx emitted from coal combustion can cause great harm to the environment and human health. The se-lective catalytic reduction (SCR) deNOx technology is a mature commercial deNOx technology, of which the SCR catalyst is the core. In China, the SCR deNOx technology has covered almost every coal-fired power plant since the 13th Five-Year Plan. Due to the complex and harsh working environment at the operating site, these catalysts will face the deactivation and replacement. This paper presents a comprehensive and systematic review of commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 SCR catalyst from three aspects, including composition and deNOx characteristics, poisoning, and regeneration, based on studies published in the recent years. It has an important guiding sig-nificance for the poisoning study and regeneration technology development of commercial SCR catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据