4.7 Article

Sexual selection on male but not female function in monoecious and dioecious populations of broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia)

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0919

关键词

Bateman gradients; clonal growth; dioecy; modularity; monoecy; sexual systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study measured sexual selection in two populations of the clonal plant Sagittaria latifolia using parentage analysis and residual regression. The results showed differences in promiscuity between the male and female functions and detected sexual selection in both populations. This study contributes to the understanding of sexual selection in plant populations, including hermaphroditic populations.
Direct measures of sexual selection in plants are rare and complicated by immobility and modular growth. For plants, instantaneous measures of fitness typically scale with size, but covariances between size and mating success could obscure the detection of sexual selection. We measured the magnitude of sexual selection in a monoecious and a dioecious population of the clonal plant Sagittaria latifolia using Bateman gradients (ss(ss)). These gradients were calculated using parentage analysis and residual regression to account for the effects of shoot and clone size on mating and reproductive success. In both populations, (i) there was greater promiscuity via male function than via female function and (ii) ss(ss) were positive, with significant associations between mating and reproductive success for male but not female function. Moreover, estimated beta(ss) were similar for the monoecious and dioecious populations, possibly because non-overlapping female and male sex phases in hermaphroditic S. latifolia reduced the scope for interference between sex functions during mating. This study builds on previous studies of selection on plant mating traits, and of sexual selection under experimental conditions, by showing that sexual selection can operate in natural populations of plants, including populations of hermaphrodites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据