4.8 Article

Type IV pili trigger episymbiotic association of Saccharibacteria with its bacterial host

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215990119

关键词

candidate phyla radiation; Saccharibacteria; TM7; episymbiosis; type IV pili

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2021YFC2301000, 2021YFA0717000, 2021YFC2103300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [92251302, 91951103, 31970091, 21822408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have identified a novel microbial community called TM7, which is an obligate symbiont that binds to its host through twitching-like motility mediated by type IV pili (T4P). This research provides insights into the lifestyle of TM7 and the diversity of CPR bacteria.
Recent characterization of the obligate episymbiont Saccharibacteria (TM7) belonging to the candidate phyla radiation (CPR) has expanded the extent of microbial diversity. However, the episymbiotic lifestyle of TM7 is still underexploited due to the deficiency of cultivated representatives. Here, we describe gene-targeted TM7 cultivation guided by repurposing epicPCR (emulsion, paired isolation, and concatenation PCR) to capture in situ TM7-host associations. Using this method, we obtained a novel Saccharibacteria isolate TM7i and its host Leucobacter aridicollis J1 from Cicadae Periostracum, the castoff shell of cicada. Genomic analyses and microscopic characterizations revealed that TM7i could bind to J1 through twitching-like motility mediated by type IV pili (T4P). We further showed that the inhibition of T4P extrusion suppressed the motility and host adherence of TM7i, resulting in its reduced growth. However, the inactivation of T4P had little effect on the growth of TM7i that had already adhered to J1, suggesting the essential role of T4P in host recognition by TM7i. By capturing CPR-host association and elaborating the T4P-dependent episymbiotic association mechanism, our studies shed light on the distinct yet widespread lifestyle of CPR bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据