4.8 Article

Synthetic nanobodies as tools to distinguish IgG Fc glycoforms

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2212658119

关键词

nanobody; glycobiology; immunoglobulin

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-034057]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19AI111825, R01AI155716, R01AI146329, R01AI117927, R01AI137276]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM007739]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-034057] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes a method to identify and characterize nanobodies that can distinguish specific glycoforms, which is useful for studying protein glycosylation. The method allows for clinical stratification of infected individuals and disruption of specific immune responses.
Protein glycosylation is a crucial mediator of biological functions and is tightly regulated in health and disease. However, interrogating complex protein glycoforms is challenging, as current lectin tools are limited by cross-reactivity while mass spectrometry typically requires biochemical purification and isolation of the target protein. Here, we describe a method to identify and characterize a class of nanobodies that can distinguish glycoforms without reactivity to off-target glycoproteins or glycans. We apply this technology to immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc glycoforms and define nanobodies that specifically recognize either IgG lacking its core-fucose or IgG bearing terminal sialic acid residues. By adapting these tools to standard biochemical methods, we can clinically stratify dengue virus and SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals based on their IgG glycan profile, selectively disrupt IgG-Fc gamma. receptor binding both in vitro and in vivo, and interrogate the B cell receptor (BCR) glycan structure on living cells. Ultimately, we provide a strategy for the development of reagents to identify and manipulate IgG Fc glycoforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据