4.8 Article

The molecular basis for pore pattern morphogenesis in diatom silica

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211549119

关键词

biomineralization; mesoporous silica; silica deposition vesicle; phase separation; ankyrin-repeat domain

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KR1853/8-2, EXC-2068 - 390729961]
  2. DFG [FR3429/4-1]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03Z2ES1, 03Z22EB1]
  4. German Research Foundation [INST 269/731-1 FUGG]
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/EFRE) [100232736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomineral-forming organisms produce inorganic materials with complex morphologies. This study focused on diatoms and identified new biomineralization proteins involved in silica biosynthesis. Knocking out specific genes led to aberrations in silica biogenesis, suggesting a mechanism of liquid-liquid phase separation for pore pattern morphogenesis.
Biomineral-forming organisms produce inorganic materials with complex, genetically encoded morphologies that are unmatched by current synthetic chemistry. It is poorly understood which genes are involved in biomineral morphogenesis and how the encoded proteins guide this process. We addressed these questions using diatoms, which are par-adigms for the self-assembly of hierarchically meso-and macroporous silica under mild reaction conditions. Proteomics analysis of the intracellular organelle for silica biosyn-thesis led to the identification of new biomineralization proteins. Three of these, coined dAnk1-3, contain a common protein-protein interaction domain (ankyrin repeats), indicating a role in coordinating assembly of the silica biomineralization machinery. Knocking out individual dank genes led to aberrations in silica biogenesis that are con-sistent with liquid-liquid phase separation as underlying mechanism for pore pattern morphogenesis. Our work provides an unprecedented path for the synthesis of tailored mesoporous silica materials using synthetic biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据