4.6 Article

Experimental and modeling study on the ignition delay times of ammonia/methane mixtures at high dilution and high temperatures

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 4399-4407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2022.07.265

关键词

Ammonia; methane; Shock tube; Ignition delay times; Kinetic modeling; High dilution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonia is a promising clean fuel due to its carbon-free nature and high hydrogen density, but its low reactivity and potential high NOx emissions limit its applications. Blending methane into ammonia enhances its reactivity, while lean combustion is an effective approach to control NOx emissions. This study developed a comprehensive kinetic model for ammonia/methane mixtures and found that it performs better than existing models.
Ammonia is a promising alternative clean fuel due to its carbon-free character and high hydrogen density. However, the low reactivity of ammonia and the potential high NO x emissions hinder its applications. Blending methane into ammonia can effectively improve the reactivity of pure NH 3 . In addition, lean combustion, as a high-efficiency and low-pollution combustion technology, is an effective measure to control the potential increase in NO x emissions. In the present work, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH 3 /CH 4 mixtures highly diluted in Ar (98%) with CH 4 mole fractions of 0%, 10%, and 50% were measured in a shock tube at an equivalence ratio of 0.5, pressures of 1.75 and 10 bar and a temperature range of 1421 K - 2149 K. A newly comprehensive kinetic model (named as HUST-NH 3 model) for the NH 3 /CH 4 mixtures oxidation was developed based on our previous work. Four kinetic models, the HUST-NH 3 model, Glarborg model [19] , Okafor model [7] , and CEU model [10] , were evaluated against the ignition delay times, laminar flame speeds, and species profiles of pure ammonia and ammonia/methane mixtures from the present work and literature. The simulation results indicated that the HUST-NH 3 model shows the best performance among the above four models. Kinetic analysis results indicated that the absence of NH 3 + M = NH 2 + H + M (R819) and N 2 H 2 + M = H + NNH + M (R902) in the CEU model and Okafor model cause the deviations between the experimental and simulation results. The overestimation of the rate constants of NH 2 + NO = NNH + OH (R838) in the Glarborg model is the main reason for the overprediction of the NH 3 laminar flame speeds.& COPY; 2022 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据