4.7 Article

Investigation of egg production curve in ostrich using nonlinear functions

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102333

关键词

egg production phase; mathematical modeling; nonlinear functions; Struthio camelus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to find the most suitable and recommendable mathematical function for describing the ostrich egg production pattern. The Wood and McNally functions were found to be the best-fitted functions, while the Yang function was the least appropriate.
In most countries, ostrich farming is considered a developing branch of the efficient poultry industry. The profitability of ostrich farm requires specific consideration of productions features such as the female fertility, egg production, hatchability, and growth performance. Hence, this study aimed to fit nonlinear functions to describe the ostrich egg production pattern to achieve the most appropriate and recommendable mathematical function for future studies. For this purpose, 14,507 daily records of 184 female ostriches in 5 production seasons (periods) during 2016 to 2021 were used. Five nonlinear functions including Incomplete gamma (Wood function), Corrected gamma (McNally), nonlinear Logistic (Yang), Logistic (Nelder), and Lokhorst were fitted for modeling the egg production curve in ostrich. The goodness of fit criteria's including Mean Square Error (MSE), Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to evaluate and selection of the best function. The results indicated that the Wood and the McNally functions with a slight difference in all fitting criteria were the best-fitted functions and the Yang function with the highest values of MSE, LRT, AIC, BIC, were the most inappropriate function to describe the ostrich egg production curve. The McNally and the Wood can be recommended as appropriate functions to describe egg production during 5 production seasons in the studied ostrich flock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据