4.7 Article

Resin content calculation of carbon fiber/poly (ether ether ketone) by thermogravimetric analysis

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107861

关键词

PEEK); Resin content; Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduced a method for calculating resin content using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for carbon fiber/ poly (ether ether ketone) (CF/PEEK) composites. The TGA curves and DTG curves were divided into four stages, and the resin content was accurately obtained from the transitional stage and stable stage. Results compared with other methods showed that the TGA method was suitable for resin fraction calculation with slight difference.
Resin content of composites is a dominant factor of macroscopic properties and essential to study. Taking carbon fiber/poly (ether ether ketone) (CF/PEEK) composites molded by various means as examples, a method for resin content calculation obtained along with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for thermal properties analyzation was introduced. According to results of resin mass contents, TGA curves and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) curves were divided to four stages, including non-decomposition stage of 25-500 degrees C, rapid decomposition stage of 500-600 degrees C, transitional stage of 600-700 degrees C and the stable stage of 700-800 degrees C. And resin contents were accurate obtained from the transitional stage and stable stage. Results tested by acid digestion method, ignition loss method and TGA methods were compared and it was proved that the TGA method was suitable for resin fraction calculation with a slight difference below 3% compared to results from the other two methods. By comparing results of different composites, we found that TGA methods can also be applied to other composites including reinforcements not disintegrate such as graphite, carbon nanotubes and matrix of thermosetting and thermoplastic decompose under inert gas in testing condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据