4.7 Article

Toward eco-friendly protocols: insights into direct arylation polymerizations under aerobic conditions in anisole

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 343-351

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2py01214f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct arylation polymerization (DArP) is an eco-friendly alternative to conventional polycondensation methods for obtaining specific conjugated polymers. This study investigated the use of anisole as a solvent for the preparation of poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,2'-bithiophene) under undried and aerobic conditions. The results showed successful polymerization without the activation of radical pathways or structural defects.
Direct arylation polymerization (DArP) represents an ecological alternative to the conventional polycondensation methodologies for the obtainment of selected conjugated polymers. To further improve the sustainability of the synthetic protocol, efforts have been focused on bypassing the use of toxic solvents or managing them under dried conditions and inert atmospheres. Although the implementation of eco-friendly and low-toxic solvents from the safety, health and environment viewpoint has recently been proposed, their compatibility with undried and aerobic reaction conditions has remained thus far unexplored. Herein, we investigated the viability of applying anisole in the preparation of poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,2 '-bithiophene) under undried and aerobic conditions by employing the catalytic system comprising (PPh3)(2)PdCl2/P(o-Anisyl)(3)/Cs2CO3 in the presence of pivalic acid as the proton transfer agent. We assessed that the polymerization afforded satisfactory results without activating radical pathways or incorporation of structural defects in the obtained polymers. The same aerobic conditions were adopted for the copolymerization of differently structured units affording molecular weights up to 16 500 Da, thus consolidating the C-H activation route as an eco-friendly protocol for the preparation of conjugated polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据