4.6 Article

Theoretical Survey of the Thiophene Hydrodesulfurization Mechanism on Clean and Single-Sulfur-Atom-Modified MoP(001)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 120, 期 40, 页码 23009-23023

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07103

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [21303266, 51502348]
  2. PetroChina Innovation Foundation [2013D-5006-0406]
  3. Promotive Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2013CL031]
  4. Shandong Province Special Grant for High-Level Overseas Talents [tshw20120745]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [13CX05020A, 13CX02025A, 14CX02214A, 15CX06075A, 15CX05050A, 15CX08010A, 15CX05068A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molybdenum phosphide (MoP) has been extensively experimentally shown to possess high and surprisingly increasing hydrodesulfurization (HDS) activities during the HDS process. In order to understand the HDS mechanism, we investigate the HDS of thiophene on clean and single-sulfur-atom-modified MoP(001) using self-consistent periodic density functional theory (DFT). Thiophene strongly prefers flat adsorption, which is slightly weakened in the presence of a surface S atom. Thermodynamic and kinetic analyses of the elementary steps show that the HDS of thiophene takes place along the direct desulfurization (DDS) pathway on both clean and S-modified MoP(001), because of the very low C-S bond activation barriers as well as very high exothermicities involved. More importantly, the surface S atom does riot elevate the C-S bond activation barriers but opens a new concerted pathway for the simultaneous rupture of both C-S bonds in thiophene. These results indicate that the presence of a surface S atom could be helpful for thiophene desulfurization. For comparison, we also investigate the influence of a surface S atom on the HDS of thiophene on Pt(111) The results show clearly a negative effect of the surface S atom, in accordance with the lower sulfur resistance of noble metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据