4.7 Article

Novel degradable amphiphilic 4-arm star PLA-b-POEOA and PLGA-b-POEOA block copolymers: synthesis, characterization and self-assembly

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 161-171

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2py01216b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on the controlled synthesis of amphiphilic biodegradable block copolymers (BCPs) and investigates their self-assembly behavior in aqueous solution. The BCPs demonstrated the ability to form micelles and degrade under physiological conditions, making them promising materials for drug/gene delivery.
Well-defined amphiphilic biodegradable block copolymers (BCPs) are promising materials as drug/gene carriers because they can self-assemble in aqueous medium and form various nanostructures. In this work, conditions were developed for the controlled synthesis of amphiphilic 4-arm star-shaped and linear polylactide-b-poly((oligoethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate) (PLA-b-POEOA) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-b-POEOA (PLGA-b-POEOA) BCPs by combining ring-opening polymerization (ROP) and initiators for continuous activator regeneration atom transfer radical polymerization (ICAR ATRP) using 6-fold lower metal catalyst concentration compared with other reports in the literature. A library of 4-arm star-shaped and linear BCPs with different degrees of polymerization of the monomers (LA, LGA and OEOA) was synthesized to investigate the influence of architecture, molecular weight and composition on the thermal properties, cytotoxicity and self-assembly behavior of the BCPs in aqueous solution. The amphiphilic star-shaped and linear BCPs were able to self-assemble into micelles in aqueous solution, which was confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The ability of the BPCs to degrade under physiological conditions (pH = 7.4; 37 degrees C) was also confirmed by the decrease of the molecular weight of the polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据