4.5 Article

Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite-strontium/polylactic acid composite for potential applications in bone regeneration

期刊

POLYMER BULLETIN
卷 80, 期 10, 页码 10997-11014

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04541-3

关键词

Polylactic acid; Hydroxyapatite; Strontium; Bone regeneration; Biomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, polylactic acid (PLA) was reinforced with hydroxyapatite (HAp) microparticles and strontium (Sr) powder to produce scaffolding materials with bone regeneration potentials. The results showed that the composite scaffolds exhibited good physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics, making them suitable materials for bone regeneration.
In this study, polylactic acid (PLA) was reinforced with hydroxyapatite (HAp) microparticles and strontium (Sr) powder via the melt extrusion/hot pressing manufacturing process to produce scaffolding materials with bone regeneration potentials. After the fabrication of the materials, the physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics were investigated. The morphology of the precursors for scaffold fabrication and the resulting composites was investigated. The structural characterization showed the semicrystalline nature of the PLA polymer and the characteristic reflections of HAp loading in the polymer matrix. The functional groups of the PLA matrix and the loaded variants showed the characteristic bands of HAp and Sr for the PLA-HAp and PLA-HAp-Sr scaffolding materials, respectively. Moreover, the physical property evaluation showed that with the addition of HAp, the porosity of the PLA-HAp scaffolds was reduced. However, the addition of Sr increased the porosity of the scaffolds, and this can possibly be ascribed to the grain refinement ability of strontium. The mechanical measurement data showed that the inclusion of Sr produced the maximum average Vickers hardness value of 49.1 HV. The composite scaffolds showed bioactivity potentials, thus, they can serve as suitable bone regeneration materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据