4.6 Review

Pyrotinib versus lapatinib therapy for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients after first-line treatment failure: A meta-analysis and systematic review

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279775

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to this study, pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy is more effective than lapatinib combined with chemotherapy in terms of PFS and ORR for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, but it carries higher safety risks.
IntroductionIt is critical to select subsequent treatments for patients after the failure of trastuzumab therapy. Following the failure of standard trastuzumab therapy guidelines in the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, pyrotinib and capecitabine is a grade I recommended regimen for treating patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Concurrently, in treating patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, lapatinib and capecitabine are also recommended regimens for those who have previously received taxanes, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab therapy. However, there is currently no systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pyrotinib with lapatinib among HER2+ MBC patients. Therefore, this study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and assess whether pyrotinib is superior to lapatinib in efficacy and safety. MethodsRelevant trials were searched in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception until March 27(th), 2022. The primary outcomes were PFS and OS, and the secondary outcomes were ORR and grade >= 3 AEs. ResultsFive relevant studies were included in this study, including 2 RCTs and 3 retrospective cohort studies. Pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy is superior to lapatinib combined with chemotherapy among HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients, with a significant improvement in PFS (prior trastuzumab therapy) (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.57, p<0.001, I-2 = 0%, FEM), PFS (trastuzumab resistance) (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.68, p<0.001, I-2 = 40%, FEM) and ORR (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.26-1.67, p<0.001, I-2 = 8%, FEM), but has higher grade >= 3 diarrhea incidence (RR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85-3.90, p<0.001, I-2 = 44%, FEM). ConclusionsThe efficacy of pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy is superior to lapatinib combined with chemotherapy but has more safety risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据