相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Alexandru Marcoci et al.
BMC RESEARCH NOTES (2022)
Mathematically aggregating experts' predictions of possible futures
A. M. Hanea et al.
PLOS ONE (2021)
Expert forecasting with and without uncertainty quantification and weighting: What do the data say?
Roger M. Cooke et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING (2021)
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review
Daniel G. Hamilton et al.
ELIFE (2020)
Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully
Suzanne Hoogeveen et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2020)
Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts
Gary S. McDowell et al.
ELIFE (2019)
Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments
Adam Altmejd et al.
PLOS ONE (2019)
When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3?
Sarahanne M. Field et al.
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
The Value of Performance Weights and Discussion in Aggregated Expert Judgments
Anca M. Hanea et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2018)
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol
Victoria Hemming et al.
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2018)
Can cancer researchers accurately judge whether preclinical reports will reproduce?
Daniel Benjamin et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rachel Bruce et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2016)
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Colin F. Camerer et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
Anna Dreber et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Promoting an open research culture
B. A. Nosek et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Identifying and Cultivating Superforecasters as a Method of Improving Probabilistic Predictions
Barbara Mellers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2015)
Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
Jigisha Patel
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
Investigating Variation in Replicability A Many Labs'' Replication Project
Richard A. Klein et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
Combining multiple probability predictions using a simple logit model
Ville A. Satopaeae et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING (2014)
Aggregating expert judgement
Simon French
REVISTA DE LA REAL ACADEMIA DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS FISICAS Y NATURALES SERIE A-MATEMATICAS (2011)
Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts
Andrew Speirs-Bridge et al.
RISK ANALYSIS (2010)
The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
Michael L. Callaham et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2007)
When 90% confidence intervals are 50% certain: On the credibility of credible intervals
KH Teigen et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2005)
Group performance and decision making
NL Kerr et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2004)
分享论文
