4.6 Article

Genome destabilization-associated phenotypes arising as a consequence of therapeutic treatment are suppressed by Olaparib

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281168

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignancy is often accompanied by therapeutic resistance and metastasis, which typically occur after treatment. It has been found that DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by camptothecin (CPT) and radiation can endanger genome stability in surviving cancer cells, leading to the development of resistance. Accumulation of cytosolic DNA due to genomic destabilization activates the cGAS/STING pathway, ultimately resulting in increased cell migration and metastasis. Interestingly, the PARP inhibitor Olaparib can suppress these genomic destabilization-associated phenotypes, reducing the risk of therapeutic resistance and cell migration.
Malignancy is often associated with therapeutic resistance and metastasis, usually arising after therapeutic treatment. These include radio- and chemo-therapies, which cause cancer cell death by inducing DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). However, it is still unclear how resistance to these DSBs is induced and whether it can be suppressed. Here, we show that DSBs induced by camptothecin (CPT) and radiation jeopardize genome stability in surviving cancer cells, ultimately leading to the development of resistance. Further, we show that cytosolic DNA, accumulating as a consequence of genomic destabilization, leads to increased cGAS/STING-pathway activation and, ultimately, increased cell migration, a precursor of metastasis. Interestingly, these genomic destabilization-associated phenotypes were suppressed by the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. Recognition of DSBs by Rad51 and genomic destabilization were largely reduced by Olaparib, while the DNA damage response and cancer cell death were effectively increased. Thus, Olaparib decreases the risk of therapeutic resistance and cell migration of cells that survive radio- and CPT-treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据