4.6 Article

A validation study for a bat-inspired sonar sensing simulator

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280631

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many bats use echoes to navigate dense vegetation, but foliage echoes can both provide information and create clutter that hinders prey detection. Therefore, it is important to study foliage echoes and their role in bat's sensory ecology. In this study, we improved an existing foliage echo simulator to better match real experiments, allowing for more flexibility in setup and mimicking natural conditions. By comparing simulated echoes with experimental echoes, we assessed the accuracy of the simulator in replicating the echo-generating process and extended the study to estimating the environment's map.
Many species of bats rely on echoes to forage and navigate in densely vegetated environments. Foliage echoes in some cases can help bats gather information about the environment, whereas in others may generate clutter that can mask prey echoes during foraging. It is therefore important to study foliage echoes and their role in bat's sensory ecology. In our prior work, a foliage echo simulator has been developed; simulated echoes has been compared with field recordings using a biomimetic sonar head. In this work, we improve the existing simulator by allowing more flexible experimental setups and enabling a closer match with the experiments. Specifically, we add additional features into the simulator including separate directivity patterns for emitter and receiver, the ability to place emitter and receiver at distinct locations, and multiple options to orient the foliage to mimic natural conditions like strong wind. To study how accurately the simulator can replicate the real echo-generating process, we compare simulated echoes with experimental echoes measured by ensonifying a single leaf across four different species of trees. We further extend the prior work on estimating foliage parameters to estimating a map of the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据